These provisions implement to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation. Read more
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to the offender along with the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Just some years ago, searching for case precedent was a challenging and time consuming endeavor, necessitating people today to search through print copies of case law, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a bunch of case law search prospects, and several sources offer free access to case regulation.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a possibility of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more
However it really is made very clear that police is free to acquire action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also be certain regard of your family shed in accordance with regulation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security of the house is concerned, which just isn't public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is realized. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated above. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is here very well-settled that while thinking about the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to take into account the merit of all of the suitable candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to such suitable candidates who're found for being most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed through the respondent department just to increase favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part in the respondent department.
five hundred,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) each and the same shall be stored from the police station into the effect that no harm shall be caused into the petitioners. five. In view of the above mentioned, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Consequently, this petition is admissible based on founded court precedents, as well as the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a properly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.